Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 4418 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 13% better in The Last of Us Part I than Phenom II X4 810 - 142 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 12 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €182.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10507 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i5 |
Deneb | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |