Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8350K outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8350K is 1129 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 8% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8320E - 296 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 91 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i3-8350K |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |