Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 6 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-8320E - 125 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 24 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
