Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 43 days older than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 4% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8320E - 332 vs 318 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
