Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1031 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 20% better in Far Cry 6 than FX-8320E - 109 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 64 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | EPYC |
Vishera | Codename | Naples |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |