Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1983 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-6350 - 202 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 24 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Vishera | Codename | Colfax |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 6 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
