Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 187 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 348 vs 333 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Colfax | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
