Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2740 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - €38.99 vs €89.94
- Up to 51% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Ryzen 3 3100 - €0.2 vs €0.41 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 13% better in Borderlands 3 than FX-6300 - 221 vs 196 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Buy for €38.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Buy for €89.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |