Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

FX-6100 vs Core i3-9100F

FX-6100 vs Core i3-9100F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2750 days newer than FX-6100.

Advantages of AMD FX-6100

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 6 vs 4 threads

Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F

  • Performs up to 19% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6100 - 106 vs 89 FPS
  • Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
This is a free version of Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020.
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD FX-6100 Logo
FX-6100

Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011


FPS

89

83%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Core i3-9100F Logo
Core i3-9100F

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


FPS

106

100%

Value, €/FPS

€1.22/FPS

100%

Price, €

€128.88

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Core i3-9100F Processore 4x3.6 (Boost 4.2) GHz 6MB-L3 Cache Socket 1151

Buy for 128.88 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 121 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD FX-6100 Logo
FX-6100

Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011

Intel Core i3-9100F Logo
Core i3-9100F

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD FX-6100 Logo
FX-6100

Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011


Single-Core

381

27%

Multi-Core

1224

33%

Intel Core i3-9100F Logo
Core i3-9100F

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


Single-Core

1374

100%

Multi-Core

3669

100%

AMD FX-6100 Logo

AMD FX-6100

vs
Intel Core i3-9100F Logo

Intel Core i3-9100F

Oct 12th, 2011Release Date
Apr 23rd, 2019
FXCollectionCore i3
ZambeziCodenameCoffee Lake
AMD Socket AM3+SocketIntel Socket 1151
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
6
Cores4
6
Threads4
3.3 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.2 GHz
95 WTDP
65 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
16.5xMultiplier
36.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
Yes
OverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.