Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2521 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 9% better in World of Warcraft than FX-6100 - 167 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Athlon |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
