Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 874 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 5 than EPYC 7551 - 197 vs 196 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €82.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13035 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
EPYC | Collection | Athlon |
Naples | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |