Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7443P outperforms Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7443P is 295 days older than Celeron G6900.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7443P
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G6900 - 316 vs 314 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 48 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7443P doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
314
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7443P | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Celeron |
Milan | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
200 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |