Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7443P outperforms Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7443P is 3718 days newer than Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7443P
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-2400S - 191 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD EPYC 7443P - 65 vs 200 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7443P doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
189
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7443P | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Milan | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
200 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |