Buy on Amazon
€50.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 946 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 15% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron G3930 - 126 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 51 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
110
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel BX80677G3930 Processore Celeron G3930, S 1151, Kaby Lake, Dual Core, 2 Thread, 2.9GHz, 2MB Cache, 1050MHz GPU, 51W, Argento
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| EPYC | Collection | Celeron |
| Rome | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 120 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
