Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 105 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 2042 than Athlon 3000G - 159 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
153
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €82.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
EPYC | Collection | Athlon |
Rome | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |