Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 4312 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 18% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5620 - 130 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
130
100%
Value, £/FPS
£19.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£2511.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £2,511.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7037 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5620 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |