Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 4578 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 80 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Dishonored 2 than Xeon E5620 - 275 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
275
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1099.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5620 | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |