Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 3887 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 18% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5620 - 130 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 32 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
130
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£279.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £279.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7033 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5620 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |