The Xeon E5620 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-12100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Xeon E5620
The Core i3-12100F is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i3-12100F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 58 vs 80 Watts
Xeon E5620 vs Core i3-12100F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Average FPS
165
81%
Min 1% FPS
111
83%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-12100F
Jan 10th, 2022
Average FPS
203
100%
Min 1% FPS
134
100%
Price, £
£70.97
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.34/FPS
100%
Xeon E5620 vs Core i3-12100F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5620 vs Core i3-12100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5620 vs Core i3-12100F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
2.66 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-12100F
Jan 10th, 2022
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Xeon E5620 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 10th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $97.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| 80 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 GHz |
| 12 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
