Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100F is 2758 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - £49.95 vs £75.97
Advantages of Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 61% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 517 vs 321 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - £0.15 vs £0.16 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 346 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
517
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£75.97
65%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £75.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 345 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |