Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100F is 1646 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 5 3600 - 468 vs 424 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - £74.97 vs £101.40
- Up to 33% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 5 3600 - £0.16 vs £0.24 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
468
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£74.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £74.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7269 minutes ago
Buy for £101.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7270 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-14100F | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |