Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2045 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - £49.95 vs £70.00
- Up to 9% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-12100F - £0.10 vs £0.11 per FPS
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 28% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 664 vs 519 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 58 vs 140 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
519
78%
Value, £/FPS
£0.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Buy for £70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |