Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900 is 904 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900 - 128 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 167 vs 160 FPS
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - £568.99 vs £5695.00
- Up to 90% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - £3.41 vs £35.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
160
96%
Value, £/FPS
£35.59/FPS
10%
Price, £
£5695
9%
Buy for £5,695 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 430 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
167
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£568.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £568.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 429 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 24 |
128 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |