Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10920X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10920X is 269 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10920X - 128 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 221 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - £764.99 vs £5695.00
- Up to 87% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - £3.46 vs £26.00 per FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 165 vs 280 Watts
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
219
99%
Value, £/FPS
£26/FPS
13%
Price, £
£5695
13%
Buy for £5,695 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8674 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
221
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.46/FPS
100%
Price, £
£764.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £764.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8674 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Castle Peak | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 12 |
128 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 165 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |