Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900 is 891 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 34% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10850K - 549 vs 411 FPS
- Up to 16% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10850K - £1.03 vs £1.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-10850K
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - £507.35 vs £567.99
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
549
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.03/FPS
100%
Price, £
£567.99
89%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £567.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
Buy for £507.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900 | vs | Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |