Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900 is 1260 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Core i9-10850K
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - £507.35 vs £570.81
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 15% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-10850K - 157 vs 137 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-10850K - £3.64 vs £3.70 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £507.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1270 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
157
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.64/FPS
100%
Price, £
£570.81
88%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £570.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1269 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10850K | vs | Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |