Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1646 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £102.17 vs £499.98
- Up to 75% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-14900F - £0.14 vs £0.55 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 25% better in Minecraft than Ryzen 5 3600 - 905 vs 722 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
722
80%
Value, £/FPS
£0.14/FPS
100%
Price, £
£102.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £102.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
905
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.55/FPS
25%
Price, £
£499.98
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for £499.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |