Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - £102.17 vs £424.09
- Up to 76% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10900KF - £0.82 vs £3.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 3600 - 125 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 20 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
124
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.82/FPS
100%
Price, £
£102.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £102.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.39/FPS
24%
Price, £
£424.09
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for £424.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |