Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 851 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - £100.84 vs £346.84
- Up to 67% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900K - £0.53 vs £1.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 3600 - 214 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
190
89%
Value, £/FPS
£0.53/FPS
100%
Price, £
£100.84
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £100.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 514 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
214
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.62/FPS
33%
Price, £
£346.84
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for £346.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 514 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |