Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - £101.21 vs £396.68
- Up to 74% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-10700KF - £0.82 vs £3.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 3600 - 125 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
124
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.82/FPS
100%
Price, £
£101.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £101.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.17/FPS
26%
Price, £
£396.68
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for £396.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |