Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-12400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900F is 734 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-12400.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-12400 - 168 vs 164 FPS
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - £499.98 vs £2511.32
- Up to 81% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-12400 - £2.98 vs £15.31 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
168
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.98/FPS
100%
Price, £
£499.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £499.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6548 minutes ago
Buy for £2,511.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6549 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |