The Ryzen 3 3200G is a much slower gaming CPU than the Celeron G6900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3200G
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G6900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Ryzen 3 3200G vs Celeron G6900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
179
93%
Min 1% FPS
119
94%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, £
£69.36
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.36/FPS
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G vs Celeron G6900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 3 3200G vs Celeron G6900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 3 3200G vs Celeron G6900 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 3 3200G | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $52.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
| Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
