Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 2288 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Tanks than Xeon X5650 - 523 vs 504 FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
523
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Xeon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |