Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 1140 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 23 than Xeon X5650 - 149 vs 147 FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
149
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.4/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Xeon | Collection | FX |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |