Key Differences
In short — Xeon Silver 4116 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon Silver 4116 is 266 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Silver 4116
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G4900 - 120 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon Silver 4116 - 54 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon Silver 4116 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon Silver 4116
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon Silver 4116 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Xeon Silver | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 85 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
