Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1439 days newer than Xeon E5-2695 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 115 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 10% better in Valorant than Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 751 vs 681 FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
751
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.42/FPS
100%
Price, £
£315
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |