Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Xeon E5-2673 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 651 days newer than Xeon E5-2673 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 105 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 13% better in HITMAN 2 than Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 132 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 8 vs 4 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
132
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |