Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E5-2673 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 1899 days newer than Xeon E5-2673 v3.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 118 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
118
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£60
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |