Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Xeon E5-2670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1567 days newer than Xeon E5-2670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 115 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 9% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Xeon E5-2670 - 84 vs 77 FPS
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
84
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.59/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |