Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2670 outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2670 is 419 days older than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-4350 - 450 vs 446 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 115 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 16 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2670
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
