Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon E5-2630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1983 days newer than Xeon E5-2630.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E5-2630 - 222 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 - 24 vs 12 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
222
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.42/FPS
100%
Price, £
£315
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |