Buy on Amazon
£315
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $306
Availability
MSRP in USD: $306
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1067 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 85 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 12% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 123 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 24 vs 6 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
123
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.56/FPS
100%
Price, £
£315
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Processor - (12 Core/24 Threads) - YD192XA8AEWOF
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 6 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
