Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2149 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 85 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 281 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
281
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.05/FPS
100%
Price, £
£295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |