Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 835 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Far Cry 3 than Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 138 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
138
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.78/FPS
100%
Price, £
£521.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £521.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |