Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 is 231 days older than FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620
- Performs up to 12% better in Diablo IV than FX-8350 - 109 vs 97 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 125 vs 130 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
