Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 916 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 130 vs 135 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Xeon E5-1620 - 194 vs 191 FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 135 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |