Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 1410 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - £49.95 vs £119.95
- Up to 57% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i5-10600KF - £0.3 vs £0.69 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 174 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
168
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.3/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
174
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.69/FPS
43%
Price, £
£119.95
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |