Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-4690 - 125 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - £44.99 vs £119.95
- Up to 60% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-10600KF - £0.38 vs £0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.96/FPS
39%
Price, £
£119.95
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
119
95%
Value, £/FPS
£0.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£44.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |