Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 2758 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - £49.95 vs £108.97
- Up to 36% better value when playing Rust than Core i3-14100F - £0.28 vs £0.44 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 36% better in Rust than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 246 vs 181 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
181
73%
Value, £/FPS
£0.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
246
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.44/FPS
63%
Price, £
£108.97
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for £108.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |