Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 734 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G6900 - 149 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - £58.99 vs £72.97
- Up to 10% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-14100F - £0.44 vs £0.49 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
149
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.49/FPS
89.79591836734694%
Price, £
£72.97
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for £72.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
90.60402684563759%
Value, £/FPS
£0.44/FPS
100%
Price, £
£58.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £58.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1603
64.32584269662921%
Multi-Core
2696
32.171837708830544%
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |